animal testing有什么优点或好处 最好是英文的 有资料作解释最好
答案:1 悬赏:50
解决时间 2021-02-18 19:01
- 提问者网友:王者佥
- 2021-02-18 04:17
animal testing有什么优点或好处 最好是英文的 有资料作解释最好
最佳答案
- 二级知识专家网友:神的生死簿
- 2021-02-18 05:23
(It is true that medicines and other products are routinely tested on animals before they are cleared for human use. While I tend towards the viewpoint that animal testing is morally wrong, I would have to support a limited amount of animal experimentation for the development of medicines.)这段可以用在文章的开头。
观点:1.Supporters of the use of animals in medical research believe that a certain amount of suffering on the part of mice or rats can be justified if human lives are saved.
2.Animal testing has helped to develop vaccines against diseases like rabies, polio, measles and TB Antibiotics, HIV drugs, insulin and cancer treatments rely on animal tests. Other testing methods aren’t advanced enough.
3.Operations on animals helped to develop organ transplant and open-heart surgery techniques. Human life has greater value than animal itself.
4.Legislation protects all lab animals from cruelty or mistreatment.
5.Millions of animals are killed for food every year— if anything, medical research is a more worthy death.
6.Few animals feel any pain as they are killed before they have the chance to suffer.
总结:1.The major pro for animal testing is that it aids researchers in finding drugs and treatments to improve health and medicine. Many medical treatments have been made possible by animal testing. It is for this reason that animal testing is considered vital for improving human health and it is also why the scientific community and many members of the public support its use. In fact, there are also individuals who are against animal testing for cosmetics but still support animal testing for medicine and the development of new drugs for diseases.
2.Another important aspect to note is that animal testing helps to ensure the safety of drugs and many other substances humans use or are exposed to regularly. Drugs in particular can carry significant dangers with their use but animal testing allows researchers to initially gauge the safety of drugs prior to commencing trials on humans. This means that human harm is reduced and human lives are saved— not simply from avoidance of the dangers of drugs but because the drugs themselves save lives as well as improve the quality of human life.
3.Scientists typically use animals for testing purposes because they are considered similar to humans. Researchers do recognize the limitation sand differences but the testing is done on animals because they are thought to be the closest match and best one with regards to applying this data to humans.追答
追问:有没有什么资料能辅助观点的我是用来写辩论稿的所以有没有什么资料之类的谢谢
追答:我看了那些关于animaltesting的外文网站,都是关于反对意见的,毕竟外国人的动物保护意识比较强,所以外文资料还真不好找。你只能从人类通过动物实验取得 的科研成果这方面来阐述了。上面那些观点都挺好的 ,你就找一下相关新闻的事例,翻译成英文就可以了。比如人类如何残忍虐待动物,比起科学实验有过之而无不及,可以用来反驳正方提出的虐待动物的观点。
追问:那如果我的观点是animal testing应该被禁止 那应该怎么写呢英文的最好啦 谢谢就跟你第一条发给我的内个一样就好谢谢啦
追答:支持的观点:
1.Animal experiment can be misleading. An animal’s response to a drug can be different to a human’s.
2.The stress that animals endure in labs can affect experiments, making the result meaningless.
3.Animals are also used to test items like cleaning products, which benefit mankind less than medicine or surgery.
4.Animals have as much right to life as human beings.
5.Strict controls have not prevented researchers from abusing animals— although such instances are rare.
6.Deaths through research are absolutely unnecessary and are morally no different from murder. When locked up they suffer tremendous stress. Can we know they don’t feels pain?
还有总结性观点写不下了,超过字数规定,你再追问一下,我粘贴给你
追问:嗯好有没有资料什么的最好啦
追答:总结性观点:
1.In animal testing, countless animals are experimented on and then killed after their use. Others are injured and will still live the remainder of their lives in captivity. The unfortunate aspect is that many of these animals received tests for substances that will never see approval or public consumption and use. It is this aspect of animal testing that many view as a major negative against the practice. This aspect seems to show the idea that the animal died in vain because no directbenefit to humans occurred from the animal testing.
还有第二个观点,字数还是太多了,放不下,。。。。。
追问:
观点:1.Supporters of the use of animals in medical research believe that a certain amount of suffering on the part of mice or rats can be justified if human lives are saved.
2.Animal testing has helped to develop vaccines against diseases like rabies, polio, measles and TB Antibiotics, HIV drugs, insulin and cancer treatments rely on animal tests. Other testing methods aren’t advanced enough.
3.Operations on animals helped to develop organ transplant and open-heart surgery techniques. Human life has greater value than animal itself.
4.Legislation protects all lab animals from cruelty or mistreatment.
5.Millions of animals are killed for food every year— if anything, medical research is a more worthy death.
6.Few animals feel any pain as they are killed before they have the chance to suffer.
总结:1.The major pro for animal testing is that it aids researchers in finding drugs and treatments to improve health and medicine. Many medical treatments have been made possible by animal testing. It is for this reason that animal testing is considered vital for improving human health and it is also why the scientific community and many members of the public support its use. In fact, there are also individuals who are against animal testing for cosmetics but still support animal testing for medicine and the development of new drugs for diseases.
2.Another important aspect to note is that animal testing helps to ensure the safety of drugs and many other substances humans use or are exposed to regularly. Drugs in particular can carry significant dangers with their use but animal testing allows researchers to initially gauge the safety of drugs prior to commencing trials on humans. This means that human harm is reduced and human lives are saved— not simply from avoidance of the dangers of drugs but because the drugs themselves save lives as well as improve the quality of human life.
3.Scientists typically use animals for testing purposes because they are considered similar to humans. Researchers do recognize the limitation sand differences but the testing is done on animals because they are thought to be the closest match and best one with regards to applying this data to humans.追答
追问:有没有什么资料能辅助观点的我是用来写辩论稿的所以有没有什么资料之类的谢谢
追答:我看了那些关于animaltesting的外文网站,都是关于反对意见的,毕竟外国人的动物保护意识比较强,所以外文资料还真不好找。你只能从人类通过动物实验取得 的科研成果这方面来阐述了。上面那些观点都挺好的 ,你就找一下相关新闻的事例,翻译成英文就可以了。比如人类如何残忍虐待动物,比起科学实验有过之而无不及,可以用来反驳正方提出的虐待动物的观点。
追问:那如果我的观点是animal testing应该被禁止 那应该怎么写呢英文的最好啦 谢谢就跟你第一条发给我的内个一样就好谢谢啦
追答:支持的观点:
1.Animal experiment can be misleading. An animal’s response to a drug can be different to a human’s.
2.The stress that animals endure in labs can affect experiments, making the result meaningless.
3.Animals are also used to test items like cleaning products, which benefit mankind less than medicine or surgery.
4.Animals have as much right to life as human beings.
5.Strict controls have not prevented researchers from abusing animals— although such instances are rare.
6.Deaths through research are absolutely unnecessary and are morally no different from murder. When locked up they suffer tremendous stress. Can we know they don’t feels pain?
还有总结性观点写不下了,超过字数规定,你再追问一下,我粘贴给你
追问:嗯好有没有资料什么的最好啦
追答:总结性观点:
1.In animal testing, countless animals are experimented on and then killed after their use. Others are injured and will still live the remainder of their lives in captivity. The unfortunate aspect is that many of these animals received tests for substances that will never see approval or public consumption and use. It is this aspect of animal testing that many view as a major negative against the practice. This aspect seems to show the idea that the animal died in vain because no directbenefit to humans occurred from the animal testing.
还有第二个观点,字数还是太多了,放不下,。。。。。
追问:
我要举报
如以上问答内容为低俗、色情、不良、暴力、侵权、涉及违法等信息,可以点下面链接进行举报!
大家都在看
推荐资讯
• 手机登qq时,显示手机磁盘不足,清理后重新登 |
• 刺客的套装怎么选啊? |