翻译--急~恳请达人帮助

翻译--急~恳请达人帮助

Today, many Chinese scholars in film studies more outstanding people, will be • Andre Bazin and the montage as opposed to the typical school, that Bazin not only against the art of film montage as an ontology, but also against their authoritative discourse Right, so they gradually become the mainstream theory "film truth." But in my opinion, Bazin, montage and long for the relationship between the lens is certainly not the extreme dualism, but a have primary and secondary, and fusion of Maps. In Bazin believes that the film is an ontological position first, and then is an aesthetic stance, the body is the point where the lens and the depth of field long lens, but also point to formal aesthetic montage. It is the development of film history to those who deliberate, contrived expression means outdated, impeding people to pursue the true and profound, when Bazin points out, he put forward the view of history and a long shot in the film should be first and montage. This is more like the most gorgeous attributed to the flat, Bazin also should be very clear, if not the most gorgeous, would not have followed the plain and the true.Bazin was a true movie master, a master of real feelings, and more desire in the art of the era of expansion will be a long montage of the lens and the use of advanced, not a one insist on either-or dualism of art angry youth .Key words: long-shot montage Bazin primary and secondary Ontology relationships